Back to EL History / Tech page.
Overall Comment:
The Falcon suspension has undergone a thorough further development process for EL providing benefits
by reduced impact harshness, improved handling and ride quality. These changes were
significant enough to inspire many positive comments amongst the press - including claims that
the Falcon now was able to comfortably out handle even the IRS equipped VR and VS Commodore!
To help achieve these improvements the following changes were made compared with EF:
REAR SUSPENSION:

Watts Link:
The Watts Link "bell crank pivot" has been lowered by 20mm to effectively lower the roll
centre of the vehicle. This development was lifted from the suspension settings achieved
on the EF XR model range.
Rear Coil Springs:
The standard (non XR or sports suspension) rear coil springs on EL were softer by 8% to
improve the balance between ride and handling.

Upper Rear
Control Arms:
For EL, the rear suspension geometry was revised relocating the upper control arms to
incorporate similar geometry to the EF XR, but better suited to the standard ride height of
the regular Falcon models (GLi/Futura/Fairmont/Fairmont Ghia).
On Falcon (except XR) the upper arm is shorter than EF Falcon. On XR the upper arm is
longer and manufactured of square section tube. Two mounting holes on the rear axle
exist for mounting the upper control arms. The mounting brackets on the rear axle have also
been revised to suit. These rear suspension modifications change axle path on bounce
and rebound.
Rear suspension components are not officially interchangeable with EF Falcon, including the
rear axle.
Rear Shock
Absorbers:
Please see the document entitled EL Shock absorbers for changes to
EL shock absorber valving.
FRONT SUSPENSION:

The front suspension was also slightly revised for EL to improve handling and steering.
The front strut rod bush mounting has been modified to soften the initial rate and
overall travel providing improved impact harshness (ride). This also results in
improved high load cornering and directional stability. The overall movement of this
bush is restrained by an extra 25% compared to EF.
The front strut rod bush mount is now welded to the sub frame (K-frame) and acts to retain the bush more
effectively than in EF.
Back to EL History / Tech page.
|
AU
Home / Contact /
Links
/ Home Page
/ Feedback
|
Info By Doug Bevan, site by Anthony
Robinson.
Copyright © 2000 by Doug & Any . All rights reserved.
Revised: 19 Nov 2002
.